Bridgeworks
Here's what I don't get. Why the seperate foot/bike bridge?
« Home | The Bigger Picture »
Links
- Angry In The Great White North
- Anybody Want A Peanut?
- Babbling Brooks
- The Black Rod
- Blogolitics (Dan Cook)
- Bow. James Bow.
- Calgary Grit
- Catprint In The Marsh
- Colby Cosh
- The Corner
- Andrew Coyne
- Creative Class (Richard Florida)
- Jay Currie
- Adam Daifallah
- Daimnation!
- Deadspin
- Don Street Blog
- Dust My Broom
- Endless Spin
- Freakonomics
- David Frum's Diary
- The Great Canadian Talkshow
- Inkless Wells (Paul Wells)
- Inside The Queensway (Kady O'Malley)
- Warren Kinsella
- Greg Mankiw's Blog
- Mega Pundit
- james mirtle
- On The Fence
- One More Middle Aged Guy
- Policy Frog
- Andrew Potter
- Prairie Topiary
- Progressive Winnipeg
- Adam Radwanski
- The Rise And Sprawl
- Sackville Sports
- Slate
- The Sausage Factory (Dan Lett)
- Savage Washington (Luiza Ch.Savage)
- Small Dead Animals
- Sobering Thoughts (Paul Tuns)
- Bob Tarantino
- Stephen Taylor
- Telling Tales Out Of School (Nick Martin)
- The Torch
- This Was Winnipeg
- Waverley West And Beyond
- Welch's Gripe Juice (Mary Agnes Welch)
- West End Dumplings
- Winnipeg: Love & Hate
- April 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- December 2009
- February 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- October 2010
- May 2011
uts trendy ?
I'm still waiting for a snowmobile path to the Forks.Since this is a winter City , that would make too much common sense.
Posted by
Anonymous |
1:09 PM
Maybe so that people don't get hit by the snarling-psycho drivers speeding to and from Henderson?
It'll be pretty too.
Posted by
Omega |
2:05 PM
@Hack - The separate structure is about $20 million cheaper than making alterations to the existing bridge to accommodate wider sidewalks and/or dedicated bike lanes.
@omega - I don't think it's going to be that pretty. Probably a very utilitarian structure.
Posted by
PolicyFrog |
2:32 PM
Thanks PF. I guess that makes some sense.
Posted by
The Hack |
6:59 PM
It's to cut down on all the bike related deaths of our slowest members of society (transportation wise). It's the same reason bikes aren't allowed on sidewalks.
Did you know that in 2006 alone illegal sidewalk biking was responsible for the frightening of over 300 sweet lil' old ladies?
Posted by
o0arthur0o |
4:03 AM
I can hardly wait for the announcement that we are going to pay for it with a new tax on bicycles
Posted by
unclebob |
7:44 PM