« Home | Answer: Never. Another Caretaker Government Is Wha... » | Heh. This Anti-Endorsement Could Spark Additional ... » | On The Presidential Trail... » | Headed South To See How They Do The Whole Pol-li-t... » | Really, What's More Damaging? » | Opportunity Lost (Fallout Of Short Term Planning) » | Opportunity Lost Followup » | While Waiting In Line For Drinks At The Moose Game... » | Opportunity Lost » | Good For Them »

Ka-pow!

Why I like Kate, but love Paul.

Glad to see Wells provide some balance. I was wondering the same thing after looking at the first link.

Of course, the whole comparison is apples and oranges to some extent. as powerful as the U.S. President is, there are always factors outside of his/her control that will impact key labour market stats.

I'd like to see some debt numbers too - this is the legacy administrations bestow to future generations who have the joy of paying back - with interest.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/10/twilight-in-america/

Is a more telling de-bunking of this all.

Policy Frog writes:
"...as powerful as the U.S. President is, there are always factors outside of his/her control that will impact key labour market stats."

2000: Republican controlled House and Senate
2008: Democrat controlled House and Senate

hmmm...

Post a Comment

Links