Wednesday, November 28

I'm Insanely Jealous Of This Man's Life. Yes. "Insanely".

You just know is girlfriend is a honey too.

"[Bomber lineman Tom] Canada said he's spending the off-season as a white-water rafting guide in Honduras and he'll let his agent handle his future."

Tuesday, November 27

Keep Your Eyes Open

Of the eight, I'm betting at least two or three find their way to Winnipeg.

Monday, November 26

Might Want To Do A Little Investigation On This Manitoba Hydro

The price tag of initial units looks steep, but these massive wind turbines might be more important to Manitoba's future as an energy source than the postcard turbines we've got now.

Tough Game/Embracing Technology

Just arrived back home safe and sound and despite what one buddy mentions on his Facebook site, no, I was not out of control on Saturday night after Tiger-Town.  After all, it wasn't me that almost got into a fight with Ti-cat fans and the song I was singing that night actually got sang back to me walking the concourse of Rogers Center during pre-game yesterday, so I must have developed a catchy little ditty.

I'll write a little more about the trip and mention some of the highlights later tonight, but I'm checking the in-box right now and discovered the Manitoba Tories will be streaming the speeches at tonight's Fall Dinner. (I can't go for obvious financial reasons after four nights in Ottawa/Toronto and four major sporting events (Sens/Pens game on Thursday, Vanier Cup, Grey Cup, trying to keep up with other CFL fans).

That's smart.  Might not get a lot of viewers for this maiden usage of the Flash Streaming, but once more and more Tories begin to realize the option is out there, I would have to think that it'll help some members out.  Well done.

Thursday, November 22

Headed East

See ya next week unless I perish from hangover.

Saturday, November 17

Until Petty "Gotcha" Politicians Are Called Out On Their Crap Don....

 

Just one week ago, Prime Minister Stephen Harper imposed a government-wide Mulroney isolation order until unproven allegations of a cash-for-planes deal are cleared up.

Ottawa organizers [of a dinner honouring the former Prime Minister], who had promoted the Mulroney salute as a rare opportunity to mingle with the government caucus, confided 17 Conservative MPs, including Health Minister Tony Clement, had backed out or simply not turned up.

The only Conservative of any parliamentary stripe recognized from the podium was former party bagman Senator David Angus. Mulroney loyalists tried without success to cajole a few words of praise from him for the record, but he looked over at me like I was a drill-armed pain-fetish dentist.

Even Grits seemed squeamish at the thought of being recorded as having shared the same physical space as Mulroney. Former Liberal cabinet minister Martin Cauchon ran for the washroom at the sight of me waving a notebook in the air.

The no-contact rule eliminated all parliamentary support staff who traditionally fill in for busy bosses. Politically sensitive lobbyists or industry reps joined the no-show parade, fearing they'd be caught in a published photo with the guest of honour.

It all smacked of excessive precaution and pettiness. One conference official was upset with Clement for giving the event a pass without a doctor's note. "This is about a billion-dollar health research industry, not a political grudge match," he said.

 
It is excessive and it is petty.  But it's also necessary when you have the opposition (and some media cheerleading them on) making claims that somehow Mulroney terrible indescretion of 1993 somehow reflects on the government of 2007.

Don't give the bullshit artists credibility and the bullshit disappears.

 

I Want To Know What The Money Was For, But This Guy Is Playing Us

Karlheinz Schreiber does not to face jail in Germany and much of his accusations are based around that fact.  Do not put heavy weight in his claims.
 
That does not suggest that Mulroney is innocent of all impropriety, however it does mean that he still deserves some benefit of the doubt.

PS: The $2.1 million "settlement" was actually the government paying for Mulroney's legal fees and not a punitive settlement with Mulroney receiving that money directly.  Feels like that fact should be a little better circulated when Canadians are jumping on the "We want our money back!" train. 

Wednesday, November 14

Hey, Who Knew?

At the monthly Conservative Club luncheon yesterday, I asked Conservative Party President Don Plett about the status of the long overdue general meeting of the membership - originally slated for earlier this month in Winnipeg.

I'm paraphrasing, but, "Everything's been booked and is good to go for October of next year. Here in Winnipeg."

So there you go.

Our 18th Prime Minister

I want to believe him. He deserves to be remembered for more than this.

Can't though. Too much smells.

Still, I'll be cheering for redemption through this process. Here's hoping...

Monday, November 12

I'm Going To Be Sick

Glen Murray is on CBC radio right now talking about how the sales tax cut should be used for the cities.  This is nothing new and does not bother me.

However, he just made the point that there is a major disconnect and a lack of accountability when one level of government collects a tax and another spends it.

I've been making that argument during a private debate on the issue over the last week.  Almost word for word. 

Not sure how much I like being that close to a Glen Murray position, even if it is a right one.

Sunday, November 11

Never Forget

Stealth Issue

Nick Martin, the Winnipeg Free Press education beat reporter, has counted 46 - that's FORTY SIX - Winnipeg schools caught in the upheaval that comes from population shifts and schools closing due to lack of students, while others have to take on more pupils than they can handle. 

Money quote:

...Yet there's still no sign that Education Minister Peter Bjornson sees any role for himself or his hordes of bureaucrats in the department of education.

Closing schools, reorganizing grades, shipping kids across the city are all matters of local jurisdiction, and no matter how widespread this upheaval gets, it's apparently no business of the provincial government.


Doesn't this development merit a couple of attempts at profile raising?  I would think it would play well.  Say in suburban Winnipeg.

[hat tip Policy Frog]

Friday, November 9

If You Do Not Realize That This Is A Big Deal, You Have Not Been Paying Close Enough Attention

In other news, guess who's coming to Winnipeg for lunch on December 12th?  Might want to double check that booking Leadership Council of Winnipeg or whatever the correct name for your organization would be.

Blue Bomber Crowds (And Sports In Winnipeg In General)

So I've been wondering....Why will the playoff crowd this Sunday be so embarrassing compared to the Regina crowd?

Winnipeg's a lousy sports city, so that's definitely a factor, but what do you think is leading to such a poor turnout for the game (or say Brier tickets for March as written about here)?

Is it a reflection of less disposable income?  (Recent concert sales would suggest otherwise.)
 
What do you think is the cause?

Thursday, November 8

It Is Time Mr. Doer

British Columbia
Ontario
Newfoundland & Labrador
Canada

Recent Reading

If I read one more "Why are we cutting taxes when we could spend that money of [insert wonderfully great government program here]?" article or column, I may just scream.

If these writers and thinkers believe government spending is the cure for all of society's woes, then why not just advocate a 100% tax and let the government take care of us all?  Too extreme?  How about advocating a 60% tax rate?  If 30% is good, but not great - and 25% is a step in the wrong direction - than going higher must be the correct answer, right?
 

Congratulations Saskatchewan

I'm looking forward to watching how you continue to make moves over the next couple of years and I hope that Manitobans will also start to pay attention as well.

Though a hunch tells me that they might be forced to pay attention to you.

Premier Designate Brad Wall also intrigues me. I'll probably be stepping on some toes saying this, but I really like that Mr. Wall took it upon himself to bring forwards ideas and a plan for Saskatchewan and he wasn't afraid to lead with those policies, releasing The Promise of Saskatchewan in Fall 2004, well before last night's election. The results may have been meager at the time, but I believe it is laying the groundwork early on that pays dividends on an election night.

A fine example to be followed going from new leader to new Premier. Now we will learn if he (and his party) are as capable in office.

By the way, how's his french?

Wednesday, November 7

Ah...I Hope You Didn't Buy An American Car Yesterday When The Loonie Hit $1.08


It would have cost you a few hundred bucks less this morning.

Sunday, November 4

Unfortunately, This Makes Too Much Sense To Happen

Curtis Brown joins the 8% PST gang. He also endorses the "Use That Point To Fund Municipalities" position that a few of us have been running with for a few months.

In fact, the only point where Curtis gets it wrong is this:

Toronto Mayor David Miller’s “One Cent Now” campaign didn’t get a lot of traction in Manitoba (which is odd, considering that the City of Winnipeg once pushed for a “New Deal” for Canada’s cities), but it was a good idea that has been squandered by the federal government’s decision to cut the GST by an extra point.


Ah, no. Please explain to me how it was such a 'good' idea? Let's ignore the constitutional ramifications for a moment (because that's what proponents of this proposal are already doing), but what logic dictates that the best way to get the cities and municipalities a point of sales tax is to go through the federal government?

And how is that superior to the proposal we're making that has the feds cutting their tax and the provinces backfilling and then transferring the point? The second one is a whole lot more constitutional, but also sets up a better accountability stream for voters and taxpayers. After all, it puts local governance funding in the "relatively local" sphere of the provinces. Since the RM Act and the City of Winnipeg Charter would likely need legislative work to make the transfers all legal like (because I don't believe sales taxes are allowed under the current framework), doesn't it make more sense to leave the transfer at the discretion of the provinces?

I recently got into an email back and forth with someone arguing for the feds to get more involved in the cities and I mentioned the constitution and he basically stated that it wasn't a huge deal because jurisdiction has become blurred in so many areas already that it was almost ridiculous to make that a sticking point on this issue.

He's not entirely wrong and that's what bothers a policy guy like myself. There are a lot of areas where provinces are overreaching (think Manitoba or BC signing international climate "treaties" and such) while the feds are always susceptible to getting too involved in areas or provincial rule (the day care issue is not over).

However that doesn't make it right or in the best interests of the country. I'm not about to suggest that the BNA Act drafters were inherently perfect and that jurisdiction should never change, however how about we have that debate first before running head first into it just because one level of the government has a few tax points to spare?

Either way, the federal government did what they had to do - fulfill their key election promise on the GST - and as Curtis states:

...The decision to give cities more money falls to the provinces.


Where it belongs. And where they should do it. This is one of those "real" issues, not unlike the ones Paul Tuns wrote about the other night that politicians often avoid like the plague.

Please don't ignore it Manitoba government. Manitoba could really use this measure.

Raise the PST to 8%, dedicate a full point as on-going revenue to the municipalities, then use the remaining savings from other transfers that are now obsolete to cut income taxes.

That is win, win, win for every Manitoban.

So why is it not going to happen?



That Didn't Take Long Update:

Policy Frog brings an actual non-political roadblock to the plan....

"Also, wouldn't raising the PST require a referendum under Manitoba's balanced budget legislation? I doubt that will fly with voters."

At first I thought he was right and the plan was doomed. But then I looked at the act in question.

10(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to

(a) a bill to increase the rate of a tax if, in the opinion of the minister, the increase results from changes in federal taxation laws and is necessary to maintain provincial revenue or to give effect to a restructuring of taxation authority between the federal government and provincial governments;

(b) a bill to increase the rate of a tax if, in the opinion of the minister, the proposed change is designed to restructure the tax burden and does not result in an increase in revenue.


Now unlike many of my political running crew, I did not go to law school, but is it really that difficult to argue that both criteria are met by the plan to tax shift from the feds to the province with the overall goal of shifting a tax point to the cities while also cutting income taxes with the savings on municipal grants.

What do you think?

And oh, to the other commentator who said that government does not need more revenue, I actually couldn't agree more. I'd be willing to bet that at least a half to three-quarters of a billion could be found if a government really took it upon themselves to pare down provincial government spending.

However, there is certainly no appetite with the current government to do just that. No appetite amongst the opposition to really do it themselves. And in the end, no appetite amongst the population to force the parties to do so. In the end, the public needs to be brought around to the issue of chipping away at spending instead of simply adding to it, and that'll take some leadership from politicians, business, policy groups and citizens-at-large.

In other words, it is not going to happen anytime soon.

Also not happening anytime soon....Me becoming a tax and spender.

No, my goals with all my recent "pro-tax" positions have been with the broader goal in mine of bringing down the harmful taxes in Manitoba and trying to replace them with some less harmful ones.

This is what I would like to see happen:

1) Increase the PST

2) Harmonize the PST

3) Raise Manitoba Hydro rates to market prices and pay a profit dividend to the province

To offset the increases:

1) End the payroll tax

2) Cut provincial income taxes by raising the exemption and cutting the rates

3) Cut provincial corporate tax rates (which in combination with #1 might actually do something for the lagging private investment in Manitoba - and make up to the retail industry for the extra point of tax that they would be happy to have just seen go bye-bye)

The way I figure it, tax reform has a better chance in Manitoba than tax cutting. Let's that get ball rolling and when some of the players at Broadway have changed, maybe we'll have a shot at the whole "tax-cutting" thing.


Last Time I Checked Municipalities Report To Provincial Governments, Not Ottawa Update:

Come on Curtis, so you really think that local voters and taxpayers would be better served from Ottawa as its funding vehicle rather than the provinces?

And I'm more federalist than you likely believe, however I see no benefit of further splintering the funding vehicles for government spending. When revenue comes from more than one level of government, it becomes awfully convenient to pass the buck and throw accountability onto the other guy who then promptly throws it back on you.

What's wrong with Ottawa cutting their taxes because they have far far far more than they require or even know what to do with and then telling the other levels of government to raise their taxes if they believe they need the revenue? Just because the provinces and mayors want the easy way out, doesn't make it right for the system at large. If one level of government wants to spend a dollar - and reap the political benefits of said dollar - then shouldn't the onus for raising said dollar fall upon them?

And if not, why? Give me a good reason there. That's all I ask.

Now that being said, I would have no problem whatsoever if the feds were to spend in some typically provincial areas. Post secondary education (or better yet, post secondary RESEARCH). Highways infrastructure. (Or better yet, how about some real consideration and study of how to promote high speed rail links in between some of the key points in the country.)

But in the end, I don't want to see some municipalities cherry-picked for need revenue streams while others do not. And for the life of me, I cannot see how Joe Manitobasky in the RM of Harrison is going to be better served from Ottawa rather than Broadway, because I don't think history backs up that premise.

So to once again wrap this up, can anyone tell me why the Ottawa transfer would be the superior position to the provincial one? Other than "one's got the loot, the other is spending it on health and education"?

And Curtis, when have municipalities been the federal government's slack? When did that change? I missed that constitutional debate.*


* - Which is, of course, the step missing in this whole discussion because we live in a country that appears to believe that they got it right in 1982, so why go through the trouble of opening it up again?

Friday, November 2

Price Is Right (Or Is It?) Live Blog

9:58 am - So last month, they told me at work that I had vacation days yet to use and if I didn't get them in before the end of the year, I'd lose 'em. (They would simply pay me out, not actually take them away on me.) I figured I had enough stuff to do if I had a weekday off, so I took the day.

Last night, I decided I would use the excuse to check out the new Price Is Right with new host Drew Carey. Important work, no?

10:00 am - I like that the studio and the effects have changed not a bit since Bob Barker left. My initial fear was that they would "modernize" the show when the host switched. That would have been a bad decision.

10:01 am - Drew Carey just promised me "the best hour of my life". Bob never oversold Drew.

10:02 am - Always love it when the player who bids [someone else's bid] plus one wins. You just know the other person is stewing when they sit back down. The woman who won wanted Drew to read her shirt which said, "I married a former marine who is heavyset and wears glasses." Drew played nicely, but you just have to know that inside he was like, "Yeah, thanks for pointing it out like that....Bitch."

Still, he appeared genuinely happy for her when she won the first game to pick up a big screen. One of those lame "just make a single decision yay or nay" games. I'm so hoping for a Plinko day.

10:06 am - *clang, clang, clang, clang, clang!* SOMEONE HAS BID THE EXACT PRICE!!!!!!

Dude in a red sweatshirt bid $1299 for a home entertainment center and takes the exact $500 cash.

Drew: Can your day get any better?

Dude in a red sweatshirt: I hope so.

Drew: What do we have for him?

Announcer Dude Who Is Not Rod Roddy: A NEW CAR!!!!!!!

He's playing the putting game, Hole In One (Or Two), for a Ford Mustang convertible.

10:10 am - Dude in a red sweatshirt (from now on simply known as DIARS) is kicking ass and taking names this morning. He strung all six grocery items in order according to price, moving him within an eight inches of the hole and taking yet another $500 bonus.

Drew did the whole "This is how you do it from back here" putt, however he was too strong and his putt lipped out. Still, he set up DIARS's ball, and DIARS promptly put it in for the win then put the funniest expression on his face, slightly smug, slightly crazed, all "I AM THE MAN AND YOU ARE NOT!"

If I'm the other contestants today, I'm worried about this dude. He's riding a wave.


10:17 am - LOL!!!!! While introducing the prizes that some lady is playing for, Drew cracked a joke about the new model "getting all the bathing suit duty".

The player, who was wearing a yellow tee with Bob Barker and Drew Carey's mug on it, was so excited she hugged Drew and gave him a kiss.

You gots to know that Drew is totally digging this aspect of the job.


10:22 am - Big spins. The first player used two spins to sit at 90 cents. Lady in Yellow came up just short at 80 cents. It's all riding on DIARS. Can he keep his streak going?


10:23 am - WHOA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I don't believe it! One spin. $1.00 If this was an old NBA Jam video game, the announcer would be shouting, "He's on FIRE!" while the ball exploded the net in a ball of flame.

So let's recap for those of us who cannot add. DIARS has won a $1299 home entertainment center, $2,000 in cash bonuses and a Ford Mustang. He's so headed into the Showcase Showdown in the driver's seat as well. He's got to get the decision on which one to bid on.

Insane.


10:29 am - Our first loser of the day. A middle-aged woman who got flustered while playing "Make Your Move". Like a no-hitter attempt in baseball, I wasn't going to say anything until it happened.


10:31 am - Gotta say, I'm so glad that Drew Carey is using the Bob Barker skinny microphone with the little ball on the end. Seems he's showing real reverence to the traditions of the game.

A cute black chick just got to contestant's row. I so hope she wins and gets up on stage next round (because she just missed out this round).


10:37 am - The cute girl Tammi gets to bid last and bid one-dollar over the highest bid. I really thought that was a smart play, but everyone was over. Below $650. $640, $500, $599 and the cute girl with $1. I'm less comfortable with this play.

Awwwww......$580. Instead of an attractive bubbly girl, we get *announcer's voice* A BIG BURLY DUUUUUUUUUUUDE!

He's playing for a car. The Dice Game! I love this game.

His first roll is a six, which is basically a gimme. Then a deuce, a five and another freebie (a one).

He played the odds on the 2 and 5. (You choose whether the real number in the price of the car is higher or lower than your roll.)

A six is higher than a two!

A two is lower than a five!

Big Burly is a winner!


10:44 am - The poor flustered lady just took a spill while spinning.

Drew: Don't worry about it. I'm sure no one at home will ever mention it again. "Hey I saw you wipe out on the Price Is Right."

With two spins, Flustered Lady has 80 cents.

The woman who wasn't the cute lady when I wanted the cute lady to win (now known as TWWWTCLWIWTCLTW) spins and is saying hell to so many people that she misses the wheel slowing down to......$1.00!!!

She lets out a mighty roar of victory!

Burly Guy steps up with big shoes to fill. He asks for permission to "spin the other way" but Drew refuses. He does offer BG a chance to say hello to someone and BG comes thru with:

"I'd like to say hello to Jesus. Thanks for the car."

Well Burly Guy, you have to ask yourself if you are being everything you can be because Jesus obviously feels you are a good enough person to win a car, but not good enough to head to the Showcase Showdown round. Stew on that tonight!

TWWWTCLWIWTCLTW picked up another cool $5,000 with her bonus spin and we're off to the finals!

10:52 am - First prize is some flashlights, a Hawaii trip and a car. DIARS has decided to play but only bid around $24,700. Oh no DIARS! I thought you were going to roll thru TWWTCLWIWTCLTW, but that has got to be far too low.

The second showcase was a hodge podge that ended with a trip to Paris and a Corvette. She bid $54,000 even. I think she's within striking distance.

What's it going to be? Who's going to win? We'll find out right after this!

10:56 am - Just what I thought....TWWTCLWIWTCLTW was only $9K off.

10:57 am - Well blow me down! DIARS was OVER! By only $100, but over nonetheless. Like the Colorado Rockies, the long wait between the first half and the Showdown totally knocked DIARS off his game. First he bids on the "lesser" showcase (which is getting blown out in Games 1 & 3) and then he bids over, if only by a bit (which is the same as losing close games in Games 2 & 4).

Oh well, another solid show. Drew handles the job well enough, even signs off the "pet population" speech Bob always made and the show keeps the vibe that has made it the best ever.

Now off to be productive for the day. Later.

Thursday, November 1

Somebody Else Checks Out

Greg Staples packs in party membership:
The whole party structure thing didn't sit well with me. I went to a couple of local meetings but it was a club not a place to discuss ideas. I volunteered to help during the last campaign but no one took me up on the offer.

It seemed that being a party member meant a constant barage of being asked to donate money and trust me, that gets old in an awful hurry.

I've written (and argued) in the past that parties are failing to provide people with any "benefit" of membership and are getting worse and worse at viewing the members as simply a resource to be tapped for clapping at rallies, rubber stamps at meetings and cash on a regular basis.

So is any surprise even politically motivated people are telling them to get lost?

ON THE OTHER HAND UPDATE:
[Link]

Conservative Party
$3,152,985.38 from 32,812 contributors
Liberal Party
$793,835.78 from 7,849 contributors

NDP
$594,479.68 from 10,857 contributors
Green Party
$218,505.14 from 3,143 contributors
Bloc Quebecois
$31,520.06 from 310 contributors


[ Elections Canada: Registered Political Parties' Third Quarter Financial Returns for 2007]


Some Sobering Thoughts From Sobering Thoughts Update:

But I'd add that policy is hardly ever taken seriously by those who play the game (politicians) and those who cover it (media). The end result is that almost all politics is bullshit. Everyday politics is almost all phony issues. The debate -- or should that be 'debate' -- over the environment has long been about Kyoto which wasn't even taken seriously by the Liberal government that signed onto it and later vowed to implement it; Kyoto is a symbol of one's commitment to the environment, not real policy. There is never a debate about healthcare or education, just how much money is going to be thrown at it. Most of Canadian foreign policy discussion is really a proxy for either our view of the United States or our view of ourselves within the world, not a serious debate over our national interests or even our actual role in the world. Most of modern politics is about avoiding real issues.


But this is a good thing he says....

New Brunswick Looking At Raising Provincial Sales Tax To "Take" The GST Cut

Come on Gary Doer!  All the cool kids are doing it.  (Well, you used to think New Brunswick was cool, but who knows now, right?)

Just remember Mr. Premier.  I'll back you on the clawback IF you redirect at least 75% of the new revenue to tax cuts elsewhere or the transfer to the cities and municipalities I wrote about earlier.  If more than a quarter of it goes to new spending alone, I'll blast away.  And rightfully so.

One Point Of Tax

In response to an emailer....

In regards to the City of Winnipeg in particular, but municipalities across the province in general, I would horse trade a full dedicated point of the provincial sales tax for taking the hodge podge of other transfers off the table and to encourage several RMs to merge.

During the election, the Tories were going to dedicate a percentage of the PST equal to existing funding already going to the City of Winnipeg. It was something like 0.6% or something like that. Might as well go full bore, lay down the full point but take the stuff like the casino money for police officers off the table. Not only would it be dedicated funding tied to growth (which the city needs), but it would be a tonne easier to administer.

And hey....I hear that the GST is dropping soon. Not a bad time to find an extra point of PST.....

Another Reason Why Otherwise Solid Tax Cuts Won't Be Getting Me Into The Campaign Business Just Yet

I cannot stand garbage like this. I'd be willing to chalk it up to a CBC spin job if it wasn't so damn believable based on the party's recent track record.

Well, At Least You Know That The Price Of Life In Manitoba Is Greater Than $46 Million*

Rightly or wrongly, the Premier has instantly called for a public inquiry into the botched case of a suspected drunk driver that killed a person.

I'm sure there will be some important work done by the inquiry, however if this case merited the cost of a public inquiry, how can any government minister with a straight face argue that the Crocus Investment Fund debacle does not?


* - That sure puts those cancer drug debate into perspective as well, eh?

Sports Illustrated

Coming across as "Yay"....

Paul Tuns

Even if you don't like baseball you should read this Sports Illustrated profile of New York Yankees' reliever Joba Chamberlain. It is a wonderful story of how Harlan Chamberlain, an American Indian from Nebraska, orphaned and polio-stricken, refused to be a victim, raised his son Joba right and made him a great baseball player and even better man. Men of faith with a passion and dedication to excellence.


And to the "Nay"....

Slate

Before ESPN the Magazine launched almost 10 years ago, SI had never faced a sustained challenge from the print world. Rather than having faith in its product—curious, well-written literary journalism and vigorous reportage—Sports Illustrated has taken to imitating its younger rival. The result: a magazine that's as hip as a 55-year-old with his hat turned backward.

This Is Why I'm Reading "A Secret Trial" Before "Memoirs"

The Fifth Estate once again asks the important question...."What was the three hundred large for Mr Prime Minister?"

I want to believe good things. I really do.

But that's a little tough to no when the man at the center of it all won't defend himself.

Links